The rubric

How we score

100 points across five dimensions. The weights and criteria below are the whole method. No hidden model. No way to buy a better number.

Weights

  • Dose adequacy and formulation25
  • Scientific evidence20
  • Regulatory certifications20
  • Disclosure and testing20
  • Manufacturing transparency15

Criteria

Dose adequacy and formulation

25 pts

Does each active ingredient appear at a dose and in a form that research has actually tested?

  • Active doses within studied range10

    Compare each disclosed active against the evidence record dose range. Full points if all actives are within range; partial if some; zero if key actives are below the minimum studied dose.

  • Bioavailable or studied form7

    Magnesium glycinate over oxide, methylcobalamin over cyanocobalamin, KSM-66 or Sensoril over generic root powder, and so on. Award for the forms that were tested, not the ones that are cheaper.

  • No undisclosed proprietary blends5

    Zero if any active hides inside a blend with no per-ingredient amount.

  • No fairy dusting3

    Deduct if a headline ingredient appears at a token amount well below any effective dose.

Scientific evidence

20 pts

How strong is the human research behind the ingredients, for the outcomes the product claims?

  • Primary ingredient evidence tier10

    Tier A = 10, B = 8, C = 5, D = 2, E = 0, pending = 0. Use the evidence record for the ingredient and form as used.

  • Claims match the evidence6

    Compare label and marketing claims with outcomes in the evidence records. Deduct for claims the research does not support.

  • Supporting ingredients justified4

    Do the secondary actives have their own evidence for the same goal, or are they padding?

Regulatory certifications

20 pts

Is the product legally licensed in India and made under recognised quality standards?

  • Valid FSSAI licence on label8

    Licence number printed and verifiable on the FSSAI portal. Zero if absent.

  • GMP or WHO-GMP manufacturing6

    Certificate for the manufacturing facility, current at review date.

  • ISO 22000 or HACCP3

    Facility-level food safety system.

  • Additional independent certification3

    Informed Sport, NSF, USP, or equivalent. Award once, not per certificate.

Disclosure and testing

20 pts

Does the brand publish what is in the bottle and prove it with third-party tests?

  • Full per-ingredient label disclosure6

    Every active with amount and unit per serving. Excipients listed.

  • Certificate of analysis available6

    Batch-specific CoA on request or on the site. Verified in brand_documents.

  • Third-party lab testing6

    Independent NABL-accredited or international lab, not only in-house QC. Heavy metals and microbial minimum.

  • Batch number and expiry traceable2

    Batch printed and matches CoA.

Manufacturing transparency

15 pts

Do we know who makes it, where, and from what?

  • Manufacturer named on label6

    Own facility or contract manufacturer identified by name and address.

  • Ingredient sourcing disclosed5

    Country or supplier of key actives disclosed. Branded ingredients count.

  • Brand answers verification requests4

    Did the brand respond to Saayou's document requests within 14 days? Award in full when they did.

Bands

  • 85+ExcellentMeets nearly every standard we check. Buy with confidence.
  • 70+GoodSolid product with minor gaps in evidence or disclosure.
  • 55+AverageAcceptable, but read the breakdown before you buy.
  • 50+WeakSignificant gaps. There are better options in this category.
  • <50AvoidFails core checks on dose, disclosure or licensing.

Coverage today

368
Scored
Every product
0
Reviewer verified
Checked against documents
0
Lab verified
Not started yet
Provisional
Read from public product information. A reasonable first read of a label, not a verification.
Reviewer verified
A person scored it against the criteria above using brand documents and published research.
Lab verified
Independent testing of what is in the bottle. Not live. This is the largest gap.

Rules

Versioned
Scores are never edited. A new score is a new version, and the history stays public.
Rubric changes
A new rubric means a new method id and a rescore of everything. Current method is rubric_v1.
Conflicts
Reviewers do not see price, affiliate program or commission while scoring.
Payment
No brand can pay to change a score, to be reviewed sooner, or to have a low score removed.
How Saayou makes money